釣魚島及其附屬島嶼是中國領土不可分割的一部分。無論從歷史還是法理的角度來看，釣魚島都是中國的固有領土，中國對其擁有無可爭辯的主權。日本在1895年利用甲午戰爭竊取釣魚島是非法的、無效的。第二次世界大戰後，根據《開羅宣言》和《波茨坦公告》等**法律文件，釣魚島回歸中國。美國在20世紀50年代擅自將釣魚島納入其“托管”範圍，後在70年代以歸還“托管”領土為名與日本私相授受釣魚島，都沒有也不能改變釣魚島屬於中國的事實。
疏震婭、張海文、魏怡主編的《釣魚島（英文版）》一書全面詳實、有理有據地說明了釣魚島是中國的固有領土，揭示了日本企圖侵占中國釣魚島的非法行徑，可以幫助**社會*客觀地認識釣魚島的問題，向社會大眾揭示釣魚島歸屬的真相。書稿內容**，對讀者認識和了解釣魚島問題，具有**大的幫助。

疏震婭、張海文、魏怡主編的《釣魚島（英文版 ）》主要內容包括認識釣魚島、釣魚島的價值、釣魚 島為什麼屬於中國、日本如何竊取釣魚島、二戰後釣 魚島理應歸還中國、美國“托管”埋下禍根、“擱置 爭議”的默契共識、誰在“改變現狀”以及中國維護 釣魚島主權的努力九個方面。通過對這些問題的闡述 ，力圖全方位地介紹釣魚島問題，以期說明釣魚島屬 於中國的歷史事實和法理依據，批判日本的無理主張 和非法挑釁，向社會大眾揭示事實真相，以正視聽。

Knowing Diaoyu Dao
The Values of Diaovu Dao
Territorial Sovereignty and Maritime Rights
and Interests
Natural Resources
Security and Strategic Values
Political Values
Why Does Diaoyu Dao Belong to China?
Diaoyu Dao was First Discovered, Named and
Exploited by China
Diaoyu Dao Had Long Been under
China's Jurisdiction
Chinese and Foreign Maps Show that Diaoyu Dao
Belongs to China
How Did Japan Grab
Diaoyu Dao from China?
Japan's Long-term Covert Moves
to Seize Diaoyu Dao
Japan's Secret Incorporation of Diaoyu Dao
into Its Territory
Diaoyu Dao was Ceded to Japan together
with the Taiwan Island
Transfer of Real Property Right after Japan's
Occupation of Diaoyu Dao
Japan Should Return
Diaoyu Dao to China After WWll
Stipulations in Cairo Declaration: All the Territories
Japan has Stolen from the Chinese
Shall be Restored to China
Potsdam Proclamation:
Limiting Japanese Sovereignty
Japan's Surrender Documents Admitting
its International Obligations
Root of the Trouble:
U.S.'s "Administration"
Diaoyu Dao Never Belongs to the Ryukyu Islands
The United States Illegally Included
Diaoyu Dao under Its "Trusteeship"
of the Ryukyu Archipelago
The United States and Japan Conducted Backroom
Deals Concerning the "Power of Administration"
over Diaoyu Dao
Changes of the U.S. Positions
Acquiescence in Shelving Differences
China and Japan Regarded the Overall Situation
of Reestablishing Diplomatic Relations
and Agreed to "Shelve This Issue for
the Time Being and Wait for Other
Opportunities to Discuss It"
The Acquiescence in Shelving Differences
Formed during the Diplomatic Normalization
of the Sino-Japanese Relations
China's Proposal of Shelving Differences and
Seeking Joint Development
Japan's Control of Right-wingers Demonstrates
that It Acknowledges That There is
A Territorial Dispute over the Diaoyu Dao
Who Is Changing the Status Quo?
The So-called "Power of Administration"
Officially Supported Civil Activities
Strictly "Coordinated Control" of Military Police
Thorough Military Deployment of Island Retaking
China's Efforts to Uphold
Its Sovereignty over Diaoyu Dao
Forceful Countermeasures of Chinese Government.
Unremitting Endeavors of China's Civil Activists
China's Steadfast Resolve to Defend Its Sovereignty
Epilogue: Facing History Squarely
and Building the Future
Postscript
Bibliograph