●1 Introduction 1
●1.1 Research orientation 2
●1.2 Working definition 4
●1.3 Rationale for this study 5
●1.4 Objective and research questions 7
●1.4.1 General objective 7
●1.4.2 Specific research questions 7
●1.5 Significance of this study 8
●1.6 Research methodology and data collection 9
●1.6.1 Research methodology 9
●1.6.2 Data collection and description 9
●1.7 Organization of this thesis 10
●2 Literature Review 12
●2.1 Introduction 12
●2.2 The construct of lawyer evaluation 12
●2.2.1 The origin of lawyer evaluation 12
●2.2.2 The constituents of lawyer evaluation 14
●2.3 Lawyer evaluation and context 16
●2.4 Lawyer evaluation in context: a linguistic perspective 22
●2.4.1 Lawyer evaluation identified in discourse 23......
內容簡介
張麗萍的這本《律師評價語言的社會符號學研究》從社會符號學視角入手，綜合韓禮德學派的話語分析模式與哈貝馬斯的主體間性，針對當前司法改革中的實踐問題――律師的法庭辯論語言進行語言學體繫構建與理論解釋；在理性思辨的基礎上，依托實地采錄的法庭辯論語料庫，有效利用中西話語分析的研究成果，從宏觀到微觀深入分析了律師在辯論中如何發表評價性意見，揭示了貌似客觀的律師話語中所隱含的主觀性態度及表現形式，*終論證了律師理性辯論模式的適切性。 《律師評價語言的社會符號學研究》運用語言學理論來探討法律交際領域中的具體問題，具有跨學科研究性質，涉及語言學、哲學、法學等學科知識，體現了應用語言學的社會實踐價值，因此不僅對法律語言學、話語分析、應用語言學等專業的研究人員與學生有啟發意義，對從事司法實踐或研究法學文化的學者或學生也有實踐參考價值，也合適做英語、法律愛好者的閱讀材料。
tructurally，lawyer evaluation can be identified and described in terms of an evalu-ator，evaluated and evaluating item.An evaluating item is the locus of an evaluativeattitude.An evaluator is the source of evaluative attitudes.The evaluated iS the ob.ject or entity that evaluative attitudes apply to.
The evaluator in this study is specifically made to refer to lawyers.It is realizedin n......
"
