內容介紹 | |
![](/c49/99/11254864.jpg)
出版社:中國人民大學出版社 ISBN:9787300172286 版次:1 商品編碼:11254864 品牌:中國人民大學出版社 包裝:平裝 叢書名:世界大師原典文庫(中文導讀插圖版) 外文名稱:The 開本:16開 出版時間:2013-04-01 用紙:膠版紙 正文語種:英文 作者:約翰·洛克,楊慧林,金莉
" 內容簡介 《世界大師原典文庫:政府論(下篇)(中文導讀插圖版)》闡釋了洛克的政治思想,提出統治者的權力應來自於被統治者的同意,建立國家的目的,乃是為了保障社會的安全以及人民的自然權利。 作者簡介 約翰·洛克(1632-1704),英國哲學家。在知識論上,洛克與大衛·休謨、喬治·貝克萊三人被列為英國經驗主義的代表人物,但他也在社會契約理論上做出了重要貢獻。他認為人民擁有生命、自由和財產的自然權利,人民有推翻政府的權利。洛克的思想對於後代政治哲學的發展產生巨大影響,並且被廣泛視為是啟蒙時代最具影響力的思想家和自由主義者。他的著作也大為影響了伏爾泰和盧梭,以及許多蘇格蘭啟蒙運動的思想家和美勛。他的理論被反映在美國的獨立宣言上。洛克最具代表性的著作是《政府論》和《人類理解論》。 目錄 Preface Chapter Ⅰ Introduction Chapter Ⅱ Of the State of Nature Chapter Ⅲ Of the State of War Chapter Ⅳ Of Slavery Chapter Ⅴ Of Property Chapter Ⅵ Of Paternal Power Chapter Ⅶ Of Political or Civil Society Chapter Ⅷ Of the Beginning of Political Societies Chapter Ⅸ Of the Ends of Political Society and Government Chapter Ⅹ Of the Forms of a Commonwealth Chapter Ⅺ Of the Extent of the Legislative Power Chapter Ⅻ Of the Legislative, Executive, and Federative Power of the Commonwealth Chapter ⅩⅢ Of the Subordination of the Powers of the Commonwealth Chapter ⅩⅣ Of Prerogative Chapter ⅩⅤ Of Paternal, Political, and Despotical Power, Considered Together Chapter ⅩⅥ Of Conquest Chapter ⅩⅦ Of Usurpation Chapter ⅩⅧ Of Tyranny Chapter ⅩⅨ Of the Dissolution of Government 查看全部↓ 精彩書摘 It having been shown in the foregoing discourse. 1. That Adam had not, either by natural right of fatherhood, or by positive donation from God, any such authority over his children, or dominion over the world, as is pretended. 2. That if he had, his heirs yet had no right to it. 3. That if his heirs had, there being no law of nature, nor positive law of God, that determines which is the right heir in all cases that may arise, the right of succession, and consequently of bearing rule, could not have been certainly determined. 4. That if even that had been determined, yet the knowledge of which is the eldest line of Adam’s posterity, being so long since utterly lost, that in the races of mankind and families of the world, there remains not to one above another the least pretence to be the eldest house, and to have the right of inheritance. All these premises having, as I think, been clearly made out, it is impossible that the rulers now on earth should make any benefit, or derive any the least shadow of authority from that, which is held to be the fountain of all power, “Adam’s private dominion and paternal jurisdiction;” so that he that will not give just occasion to think that all government in the world is the product only of force and violence, and that men live together by no other rules but that of beasts, where the strongest carries it, and so lay a foundation for perpetual disorder and mischief, tumult, sedition, and rebellion(things that the followers of that hypothesis so loudly cry out against) must of necessity find out another rise of government, another original of political power, and another way of designing and knowing the persons that have it, than what sir Robert Filmer hath taught us. 查看全部↓
" | | |